Jump to content

Talk:Jack Pelter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeJack Pelter was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 21, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
September 26, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
[edit]

When something new comes up please add to external links, thanks. --Sunderland06 11:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what help do you actually need?--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 14:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I need to know some external links on jack pelter. --Sunderland06 14:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
google jack pelter?.--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 14:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There not up to date though he now plays for sunderland. --Sunderland06 14:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be best to use links as references rather than just have a whole load of External links. Mattythewhite 17:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

[edit]

What could be done to help clean up this page. --Sunderland06 19:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA

[edit]

I still feel some more expansion and sourcing are neede before this can be considered at GA. Wizardman 22:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's gotten much better since I've last seen the article, may I point out. Wizardman 23:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

There are quite a few around for his NZ career including - [1] [2] and [3] 81.77.136.231 (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also on scoring first international goal on first appearance international tour in vietnam one year deal signing at sunderland 81.77.136.231 (talk) 16:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment: second opinion as requested

[edit]

Second opinion requested here (diff). There is thought that this might be borderline B-Class. However, whilst that might be true of a deceased subject (no more possible insight to be added) or an elderly subject (little more to be added), the subject of this article is very young (b. 1987), and therefore the potential for expansion of the article means that this remains a Start-Class article in my opinion. No change therefore. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 14:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jack Pelter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Pelter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]